GAYA KOMUNIKASI DALAM KOMUNIKASI PASANGAN ETNIS CAMPUR DI PONDOK CINA-DEPOK JAWA BARAT

Santa Lorita Simamora

Abstract


Ethnography of Communication couples ethnic mix in Pondok China, Depok is the theme of research that aims to know the communication behavior of married couples ethnic mix in certain contexts, namely local ethnic and immigrant which each carry a different culture. Individuals married couples ethnic mix has the interpersonal relationships that are typical in a domestic life couples ethnic mix, has a lot of contexts, among others, dialects and attitude adjustment when communicating. Besides cultural pattern appears in every language, communication style in communication activities and communication behavior in accordance with the adopted individual cultural patterns. Every culture has its own communication style. Culture and communication are inseparable This difference is often one of the issues when related to household communications couples ethnic mix. So in this study researchers used ethnographic methods to examine the communication in the communication style of communication activities ethnically mixed couples in Pondok Cina in various contexts. The study was conducted with participant observation throughout the period of twenty-four months to ten couples ethnic immigrants from Aceh (Bireuen Lokhsemawe), Batak Mandailing, Central Java, Sunda, and Padang who has a husband / wife natives Kampung Bojong alias Pondok Cina, Depok, West Java. One study found that the results of studies showing that the communication ethnically mixed couples where they settle and live in a village area that is Pondok Cina partner, Depok. Ethnic immigrants represent adjustments communication styles in local ethnic couples. But seen also that dialect as a partner of cultural identity ethnic immigrants did not disappear entirely.

 

Keywords: Communication ethnically mixed couples, communication style ,, ethnography of communication.

Full Text:

PDF

References


a. Buku

Arneson Richard, "Egalitarianism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2002.)

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Simbolic Interactionism ; Perspective and Method. California : University of California Press

Creswell Jhon W. Research Design; Qualitative, and, Mixed Methods Approaches. Second edition, Sage:2003.

Denzin, Norman K. Dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. Hanbook of Qualitative Research. Penerjemah, Dariyatno dkk. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur, Panduan Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi, Surabaya; Usaha Nasional, 1992

Kuswarno, Engkus. 2008. Etnografi Komunikasi : Suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Bandung : Widya Padjadjaran.

Liliweri, Alo. Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Antarbudaya, PT Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta. 2003.

__________. 2011. Komunikasi : Serba Ada Serba Makna. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muriel, Saville-Troike. 1986. The Etnography of Communication : An Introduction. Southampton: The Camelot Press.

Mulyana, Deddy, Ilmu Komunikasi, Bandung, Rosda, 2011.

_____________. 2010. Komunikasi Lintas Budaya : Pemikiran, Perjalanan dan Khayalan. Bandung : Remaja Rosyda Karya.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung :Remaja Rosydakarya.

Spradley, James P., 1997, Metode Etnografi, Terjemahan. Tiara Wacana, Yogjakarta.

Saville-Troike. Muriel, ed. 1986. The Ethnography of Communication, an Introduction.

b. Lain-lain

Lorita, Santa, Disertasi Etnografi Komunikasi Pasangan Suami Istri Etnis Campur di Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok, Jawa Barat, Universitas Padjadjaran 2014.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v8i1.2264


E-ISSN2579-3292

Dipublikasikan oleh LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License