Focus and Scope

Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen is intended as a platform for scientific research findings, theories, and critical-analytic research on Economics, Management, and Secretary, Human Resources, Entrepreneurship, and Business issues. The scientific articles combine theoretical reviews and empirical studies from related sciences, recognizance and disseminating.

The editorial welcomes the manuscripts are:

1. Marketing Management
2. Human Resource Management
3. Production Management
4. Financial Management
5. Operational Management
6. Strategy Management
7. Business/Commerce Administration
8. Secretary
9. Enterpreneurship

the manuscripts have primary citations and have never been published online or in print.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The Editorial Board will select each article for consideration through a Preliminary Review procedure. It will be sent to a Peer Reviewer for selection through the Single-Blind Review procedure. Peer reviewers take more than two months to review the substantial and technical components of each manuscript. The manuscript will be sent back to the author for revision. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen collaborates with peer reviewers who are specialists in their domains.

At least three articles recognized scientific journal publications have been written by inviting reviewers as the first author or a member of the authors.

The Single-Blind Review technique is used to send manuscripts to reviewers that are assessed to pique the attention of our readers. The Editor decides based on the reviewer's recommendations, with three options: rejected, revision, or accepted. The editorial board will select all manuscripts. If the manuscript does not fulfill the journal's standards, it will be rejected without further examination by the editors.

Editors have the authority to choose which papers are published later.

Review Process:

1. The author sends the manuscript.

2. Initial review by the Editor (some manuscripts may be rejected or returned before review). Under Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen regulation, the Editor will assign the reviewer to the manuscript which accomplished the template. If the manuscript is not following the focus and scope of Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen, it will be rejected. If there are not follow the template of Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen, the manuscript will be returned to the author.

3. The review process is carried out utilizing a blind review. There are two reviewers; if the assessment results are not balanced, they will be submitted to additional reviewers. 

4. Editor's decision. 

The Editor decides based on the reviewer's recommendations, with three options: rejected, revision, or accepted. 

5. Confirm to the author.

Publication Frequency

Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen is published twice a year, March and September.

Open Access Policy

Publication Ethics

Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen Publication Ethics

This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in publishing a manuscript in Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen, managed by the Department of Research and Public Service (LPPM) of Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, including the authors, editors, and reviewers.

This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

A manuscript publication is essential to its ethics stated in the Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen. It publishes research related to theoretical and empirical studies from various sources with responsibility. It is used for science development implemented in the Country's economic growth. Therefore, coherent and respected knowledge needs to be carried out in the Journal publication Ethics Guidelines to reflect manuscript quality from authors and institutions. Peer-review articles support and realize the scientific method. It is then essential to agree on the expected standards of ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the publishing: author, journal editor, reviewer, publisher and the public.

We take all publishing stages kindly and carry out ethics and other responsibilities. The Department of Research and Public Service (LPPM) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika ensures that broadcasting, reprinting, or other commercial income does not impact editorial decisions.

2.. Publication Decision

Chief Editor of Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen is responsible for publishing requests input from other editors and supports suggestions from reviewers published on the public. It is based on journal publications series starting from submitting manuscripts, checking editors, checking reviewers, checking layouts, checking plagiarism and copyright. It is under the supervision of the Chief Editor and other Editors with authority; thus, a publication decision emerges for the Manuscript in Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen.

3. Non-Discrimination

In Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen publishing process, both editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for scientific content without linking to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors that uphold the publishing ethics Journal Informatika, namely non-discrimination.

4. Confidentiality

Manuscripts published in Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen are highly guarded in their informational value, where editors and reviewers are not allowed to disclose the information about a manuscript that has been submitted to anyone, including the author, reviewer, editorial team, and publisher, except in an appropriate way.

5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used by multiple editorial board members and reviewers in their research.

Author's Duties and Responsibilities [Tugas dan Kewajiban Penulis]

1. Reporting Standard

The authors must provide accurate data on the manuscript submitted to Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen. The data presented contains reliable reference sources and is included in the manuscript; fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

2. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked about data and information in the manuscript must provide data related to the manuscript on time to editors and reviewers.

3. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure written entirely original works, and if the authors have used their manuscripts or the words of others, it must be appropriately cited. If there are several problems related to quoting and plagiarism in the author's work, the manuscript is automatically rejected.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publications

The author submits a manuscript for publication in Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen; simultaneously, the author cannot send the manuscript to other publishers. Simultaneous submissions from authors are considered unethical and unacceptable for the manuscript.

5. Source Recognition

Every manuscript submitted by the author to the Widya Cipta: Jurnal Secretary dan Manajemen must acknowledge appropriate bases and add value to the manuscript; all such acknowledgments must be listed in the reference list.

6. Research Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the research reported in manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Informatics. Authors listed in manuscripts are responsible for keeping co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or tools with many unusual hazards inherent in the author's use, they must identify all of these in the manuscript.

8. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors should disclose everything that supports the completion of their research in their manuscripts. All are supporting financial sources for research should be disclosed.

 9. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

The author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, the author should immediately notify the editor or journal publisher and cooperate with the Editor to withdraw or correct the research.

Plagiarism Policy

Review Guidelines

Guide for Reviewers

Article Substance Review

A reviewer guideline is used to review article material against the standard components of the article.

1. Title: The title must describe the manuscript's subject adequately, clearly, precisely and not have multiple interpretations.
2. Abstract: The abstract should briefly state the research purpose, the methods used, the results, and the core conclusions.
3. Reference Review: Authors must cite others who contributed to the article. Excessive cited sources must be avoided. The head in the introduction must illustrate the author's originality and novelty through gap analysis.
4. Purpose: The purpose of the article review should be well explained and will be able to answer the hypothesis.
5. Methods: The methods utilized to accomplish goals should be stated accurately and thoroughly enough for a competent reader to duplicate the author's work. The research tools, resources, equipment platforms, and procedures must be described.
6. Clarity: To be clearly understood, writers must write information on research methodology and results in articles in a straightforward, concise, and effective manner.
7. Delivery organization: Manuscripts must develop/explain the research subject logically and effectively.
8. Duplication: The details of published research by the author or others are not duplicated in manuscripts. If there are any duplications in the text, the reviewer can provide additional remarks. Check out whether several figures and tables may be added to create the Manuscript shorter without affecting content.
9. Calculations: Reviewers check if you can verify the authors' findings in a few randomly selected cases.
10. Text-to-Tables-and-Figures Correlation: All figures and tables must be linked in the text/paragraphs. The text's statements must relate to the contents of the tables and figures.
11. Titles of Figures and Tables: The contents should be stated in the title. Kindly suggest ways to improve the table/image titles quality.
12. Title in Table/Caption: interpretation should be unequivocal and use the correct SI units.
13. Graphics: Data for presenting graphs/images must be accurate.
14. Conclusion: Conclusions to answer the hypothesis must be stated adequately and clearly and must be supported by data and testing.
15. Allegation: The author must clearly distinguish between conjecture and fact.
16. References: All references must be provided in the Bibliography/References section of the manuscript. There are at least 15 references, with 60% primary (scientific journals, proceeding articles, reference books, thesis/dissertation) published in the last ten years.

Submitting Review Results [Menyampaikan Hasil Review]

You can download the manuscript and supplementary files when you've decided to review them. You may either fill out a review or comment form or upload a file with a comment for editors and authors to see. You are required to provide recommendations about the article's quality. At the minimum, reviews must be completed within three weeks. If you need additional time, please contact the Editor (jurnal.widyacipta@bsi.ac.id.ac.id).

Call for Editor / Reviewer

We invite you as editor or reviewer of Widya Cipta Journal (Sinta 3) via the link Editor/Reviewer registration

ndex by:

 Published LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika with supported by Relawan Jurnal Indonesia

Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450, Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License