Communication Styles in EFL Classroom Interaction

Jusriati Jusriati, Nasriandi Nasriandi, Puspa Sari

Abstract


This research identified types and the dominant communication styles used by a teacher in EFL classroom interaction based on theory of Mikoluk (2013) and Lanz (2015). Descriptive qualitative research method was applied to find out the phenomena of communication styles used by the teacher in EFL classroom interaction. The subject of this research is single participant, a teacher of SMA Negeri 3 Palopo. The participant was chosen by using purposive sampling technique. The researcher observed and interviewed the teacher to reveal the phenomena under investigation. Observation was conducted in six meetings from different context such as different class, time and learning topic. The researcher conducted observation by using audio recorder and field notes. Audio recorder was used to record teacher’s utterance in the teaching and learning process. Meanwhile field notes used by the researcher to obtain more accurate data. Interview was used to know the teacher’s dominant communication styles. The result of this research showed that there were three types of communication styles that used by the teacher in EFL classroom interaction namely aggressive style, assertive style, and passive style and the dominant one was aggressive style.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Centre for Clinical Interventions. (2008). Assert yourself! How to recognise Assertive Behaviour. Assert Yourself, Two, 1–10.croskey. (n.d.).

Gumanti, A., Yudiar, ., & Syahruddin, . (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan. In Jakarta : mitra wacana merdeka.

Hanif, A. (2012). Communication Style of Employed and Unemployed Men and Women in Pakistan. 3(19), 228–235.

KosĂ­ková, V. (2015). Communication Styles in Teaching and their Psycho-Didactic Aspects. Studia Edukacyjne, 30, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2014.30.18

Luthra, A., & Dahiya, K. (2015). Organizational Communication and Management Effectiveness: An analytical Study at Various Managerial Levels. InternatIonal Journal of ManageMent & BusIness StudIes, 5(3), 2230–9519. http://www.ijmbs.com/Vol5/3/9-anchal-luthra.pdf

Marková, V. (n.d.). The Japanese Communication Style — A Review of Research Literature. June 2011.mc crosky virginia.pdf. (n.d.).

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Miles and Huberman Chapter 2. In Qualitative Data Analysis.

Parim, G. A., & Sahiner, D. S. (2014). The Communication Styles Used by Teachers in Numerical Lessons. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2485–2488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.597

Ranger, A. S., Kosberg, R. L., & Silvestri, V. N. (1992). The Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Aggressive Communication Predispositions. Communication Research Reports. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099209359894

Suharni, Atmowardoyo, H., & Salija, K. (2018). Communication Styles used by Effective EFL Teachers in Classroom Interaction. Elt Worldwide, 5(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v5i2.7332




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/w.v12i2.8752

Copyright (c) 2020 Jusriati Jusriati, Nasriandi Nasriandi, Puspa Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Index by:

  
 

Published by Department of Research and Community Service (LPPM) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika by supported Relawan Jurnal Indonesia

Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License