Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The first ECODEMICA journal was published in 2013, with ISSN registration from LIPI Indonesia. ECODEMICA is a journal of scientific research results in the fields of Economics, Management, and Business. With articles that have not been published online or in print.

The ECODEMICA journal has both online and print versions, with a publication schedule in April and August each year.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Editors are not responsible for all content in articles related to copyrights, plagiarism, etc. The author is fully responsible for the content of the article content.

Every article that is submitted will go through a Peer Review process (blind review), from a reviewer of a piece and the results of the absolute review.

Publication Frequency

ECODEMICA Journal Publishing Schedule is:

No	Time of Publication	Period
1	April	February
2	September	July

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

Ecodemica Journal Publication Ethics

This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing a manuscript in the ECODEMICA Journal, which is managed by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, including authors, editors, and reviewers.

This statement is based on COPE's standard Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of a manuscript is very important to pay attention to regarding its ethics, this is also included in the ECODEMICA Journal. The ECODEMICA journal publishes manuscripts of the results of both theoretical and empirical studies from various reliable sources. This is important for the development of science to be implemented in economic development in a country. Thus, a coherent and respected network of knowledge needs to be carried out in the Ethical Guidelines for Journal publications. It is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the authors and the supporting institutions. The manuscripts in the ECODEMICA Journal are peer-reviewed in order to support and realize the scientific method. It is then important to agree on the expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the publishing act, namely authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.

The Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika as the publisher of the ECODEMICA Journal takes its guardianship duties beyond all stages of publishing very seriously and we carry it out with ethics and other responsibilities. LPPM BSI Bandung is committed to ensuring that broadcasting, reprinting, or other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

2. Publication Decisions

Before publishing both Online and in Print for the ECODEMICA Journal, the Chief Editor who is in charge of publishing asks for input from other editors as well as support for suggestions from reviewers. Where, it is also based on a series of journal publications starting from submitting manuscripts, checking editors, checking reviewers, checking layouts, checking plagiarism and copyright. This is under the supervision of the Chief Editor and other Editors with the authority so that the publication decision for the manuscript in the ECODEMICA Journal appears.

3. Non-Discrimination

In each ECODEMICA journal publication process, editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript for the scientific content of the manuscript regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy. This is done in order to uphold the ethics of publishing the ECODEMICA Journal, namely non-discrimination.

4. Confidentiality

Manuscripts published in the ECODEMICA Journal are highly preserved, where editors and reviewers are not allowed to disclose a lot of information about a manuscript that has been submitted to anyone, from the author, reviewer, editorial team, and publisher, but only what is appropriate and appropriate

5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used by many members of the editorial board and reviewers in their own research.

Duties and Obligations of Reviewer

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Publishing manuscripts in the ECODEMICA Journal involves reviewers in their fields, the reviewer's decision as a contribution to the editor's decision for each manuscript. The ECODEMICA journal uses a blind-reviewer process, where the results of the reviewers are communicated back to the author to improve the quality of the authors' research.

2. Speed

The ECODEMICA journal pays close attention to the timeliness of publication and information on the author. Every manuscript submitted to the ECODEMICA Journal is informed to the authors and reviewers for the process as its basic provisions. If the reviewer does not carry out their duties on time, the editor takes the decision to replace another reviewer with higher quality. In order to keep the speed of publishing time consistent as specified.

3. Confidentiality

The ECODEMICA journal is managed by LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika with the help of editors and expert reviewers. Every submitted manuscript is strictly maintained by editors, reviewers, and publishers. Given the blind-reviewer system, each manuscript entered into a reviewer can only discuss the content of the manuscript with the editor and writer.

4. Standard of Objectivity

For every manuscript that is submitted to the ECODEMICA Journal, the editors and reviewers are required to evaluate the manuscript based on established standards. However, comments from editors and reviewers need to respect the author. As well as reviewers are required to be consistent in their decisions and recommendations to editors and writers.

5. Recognition of Sources

The reviewers are required to pay attention to every source that comes from all the manuscripts submitted to the ECODEMICA Journal, where the manuscript is sent by the author through the editor. Every source needs to be known for its truth and accuracy, and be acknowledged through a list of trusted references.

6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Specific information or ideas obtained through peer-reviewed reviewers must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with authors, companies, or other institutions with which the research is linked.

Duties and Obligations of the Author

1. Reporting Standards

Authors are required to provide accurate data and informative information on the work submitted to the ECODEMICA Journal. The data presented contains an accountable reference source and is contained in the manuscript. Fraud or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

2. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked regarding data and information on the manuscript, so they are required to provide data and information related to the manuscript on time to editors and reviewers. This is to facilitate the refinement of the writer's manuscript in accordance with the rules of the ECODEMICA Journal.

3. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written completely original works, and if authors have used their work and/or other people's words, they must be cited correctly. If some problems are found related to citation and/or plagiarism in the author's work, the manuscript is automatically rejected.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

When a writer submits a manuscript for publication in the ECODEMICA Journal, the author is not allowed to send the manuscript to other publishers simultaneously. Simultaneous submissions from authors are considered unethical and unacceptable for the manuscript.

5. Acknowledgment of Sources

Every manuscript submitted by the author to the ECODEMICA Journal must acknowledge appropriate sources and are able to add value to the manuscript, all acknowledgments must be clearly stated on the list of references.

6. Research authorship

Authorities should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscripts submitted to the ECODEMICA Journal. Authors listed in the manuscript have a responsibility to keep co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or tools that have many dangers that are not normally inherent in the author's use, they must clearly identify all of these in the text.

8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscripts all the things that support the completion of their research. All financial support for the research should be disclosed.

9. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor or journal publisher and to cooperate with the editor to withdraw or correct the research.