MODEL PEMILIHAN NAGENO KATA TERBAIK PADA CABANG OLAHRAGA JUDO DENGAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS Studi Kasus: Porda Jawa Barat XII Kabupaten Bekasi
Abstract
Judo is a part of self defence sport that is popular and become the basic of defend for Indonesian
Police and Indonesian Army members. One of its category is Nagenokata. Nagenokata is the art of
self defence that shows the judo’s techniques. But during the times the judgement to the athlete
that follows the competition of Nagenokata in judo’s sport is still manual and subjective so that the
winner choosing in the nagenokata competition is still unprecise. Because of this problem, we
need to make a decision suport system that can make the jury or user of the system easier to
choose the best Nagenokata in judo sport. The method that is going to be used un choosing of the
best Nagenokata is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and use the tool expert choice in order
make the data process easier. This method is choosen the best alternative from several
alternatives, in this case the alternative means the athlete based on the certain comparative
criterias with the proponents system hoped that the jury can choose the player that is suitable with
the standard needed.
Police and Indonesian Army members. One of its category is Nagenokata. Nagenokata is the art of
self defence that shows the judo’s techniques. But during the times the judgement to the athlete
that follows the competition of Nagenokata in judo’s sport is still manual and subjective so that the
winner choosing in the nagenokata competition is still unprecise. Because of this problem, we
need to make a decision suport system that can make the jury or user of the system easier to
choose the best Nagenokata in judo sport. The method that is going to be used un choosing of the
best Nagenokata is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and use the tool expert choice in order
make the data process easier. This method is choosen the best alternative from several
alternatives, in this case the alternative means the athlete based on the certain comparative
criterias with the proponents system hoped that the jury can choose the player that is suitable with
the standard needed.
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/swabumi.v3i1.1010
INDEXING
P-ISSN : 2355-990X E-ISSN: 2549-5178