Rate and Proportion Analysis of The Decision Model from Online Learning Sustainability

Erna Fransisca Angela Sihotang; Islam Nur Alam

doi:10.31294/inf.v10i2.16713

Rate and Proportion Analysis of The Decision Model from Online Learning Sustainability

Erna Fransisca Angela Sihotang, Islam Nur Alam

Abstract

The human development index is built by three fundamental dimensions: long life and healthy life, knowledge, and a decent standard of living. This research was inspired by sustainable development goal four, Quality Education. Quality of education has an excellent relation with knowledge management. The fuzzy logic-based decision support model of online course learning suggests nine parameters to be considered. This research collaborates those nine parameters, participation rate, and the Proportion of youth and adult involvement in formal and non-formal education. The result shows that from the participation rate, it concluded that those with stable expansion also consistently enrich their knowledge by attending formal or non-formal learning; female constantly takes learning more than male; people who lived in city has more urge to learn than people who live in villages. From the Proportion from 2017, 2018 and 2022, people with ICT skills increased significantly, showing good value. Nevertheless, while female participation in learning is higher than male, it does not make female has better skills than male. Last, needed an innovation to gain interest in study to village residents.

Keywords

Education participation rate, proportion rate, sustainable learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al Faizah, S. A., Perwithosuci, W., Hidayah, N., & Abidin, A. Z. (2022). Women's Literacy Rate and Women's Labor Participation in ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 23(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v23i1.17183

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-a). Proporsi Remaja Dan Dewasa Usia 15-59 Tahun Dengan Keterampilan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer (TIK) Menurut Daerah Tempat Tinggal (Persen). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/28/1449/1/proporsi-remaja-dan-dewasa-usia-15-59-tahun-dengan-keterampilan-teknologi-informasi-dan-komputer-tik-menurut-daerah-tempat-tinggal.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-b). Proporsi Remaja Dan Dewasa Usia 15-59 Tahun Dengan Keterampilan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer (TIK) Menurut Jenis Kelamin (Persen). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from //www.bps.go.id/indicator/28/1450/1/proporsi-remaja-dan-dewasa-usia-15-59-tahun-dengan-keterampilan-teknologi-informasi-dan-komputer-tik-menurut-jenis-kelamin.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-c). Proporsi Remaja Dan Dewasa Usia 15-59 Tahun Dengan Keterampilan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer (TIK) Menurut Kelompok Pengeluaran (Persen). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/28/1448/1/proporsi-remaja-dan-dewasa-usia-15-59-tahun-dengan-keterampilan-teknologi-informasi-dan-komputer-tik-menurut-kelompok-pengeluaran.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-d). Tingkat partisipasi remaja dan dewasa dalam pendidikan dan pelatihan formal dan non formal dalam 12 bulan terakhir, menurut Daerah Tempat Tinggal. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/28/1996/1/tingkat-partisipasi-remaja-dan-dewasa-dalam-pendidikan-dan-pelatihan-formal-dan-non-formal-dalam-12-bulan-terakhir-menurut-daerah-tempat-tinggal.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-e). Tingkat partisipasi remaja dan dewasa dalam pendidikan dan pelatihan formal dan non formal dalam 12 bulan terakhir, menurut jenis kelamin. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/28/1998/1/tingkat-partisipasi-remaja-dan-dewasa-dalam-pendidikan-dan-pelatihan-formal-dan-non-formal-dalam-12-bulan-terakhir-menurut-jenis-kelamin.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.-f). Tingkat partisipasi remaja dan dewasa dalam pendidikan dan pelatihan formal dan non formal dalam 12 bulan terakhir, menurut Kelompok Pengeluaran.

Bell, L. R., McNicol, A. J., McNeil, E., Van Nguyen, H., Hunter, J. R., &

O'Brien, B. J. (2023). The impact of progressive overload on the proportion and frequency of positive cardio-respiratory fitness responders. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, xxxx, 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.08.175

De Mauro, A., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Ritala, P. (2018). Human resources for Big Data professions: A systematic classification of job roles and required skill sets. Information Processing and Management, 54(5), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.05.004

Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2022). Statistical Analysis in JASP A Guide for Students. https://jasp-stats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Statistical-Analysis-in-JASP-A-Students-Guide-v14-Nov2020.pdf

Hawkins, R. B., Charles, E. J., & Mehaffey, J. H. (2020). Socio-economic status and COVID-19–related cases and fatalities. Public Health, 189, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.016

Huang, R. (2023). Teaching Quality Evaluation of Online Courses Based on AHP-FCE Evaluation Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18, 91–103.

Lobo, J., Kamath, A., & Kalwaje Eshwara, V. (2023). Time series model for a proportion of antimicrobial resistance rate. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 21(November 2022), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101290

Mashroofa, M. M., Haleem, A., Nawaz, N., & Saldeen, M. A. (2023). E-learning adoption for sustainable higher education. Heliyon, 9(6), e17505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17505

Ng, S. F., Chew, Y. M., Chng, P. E., & Ng, K. S. (2018). An Insight of Linear Regression Analysis. Scientific Research Journal, 15(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v15i2.9347

Rackoff, G. N., Monocello, L. T., Fowler, L. A., Vázquez, M. M., Shah, J., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Barr Taylor, C., Eisenberg, D., Wilfley, D. E., & Newman, M. G. (2023). Using social influence strategies to improve rates of online mental health survey participation: Results from two experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 33(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbct.2023.05.001

Schneider, A., Hommel, G., & Blettner, M. (2010). Lineare regressionsanalyse - Teil 14 der serie zur bewertung wissenschaftlicher publikationen. Deutsches Arzteblatt, 107(44), 776–782. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0776

Sihotang, E. F. A., & Utama, D. N. (2022). Fuzzy Logic based Decision Support Model for Determining the Subject of Online Course Materials. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 12(5), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2022.0511

Statistik, B. P. (2010). Umur dan Jenis Kelamin Penduduk Indonesia Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta-Indonesia.

Sumarah, J., & Tiara Wulandari, A. (2023). Analysis of the K-Means Algorithm for Clustering School Participation Rates in Central Java. KnE Social Sciences, 2023, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i9.13320

Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597

van der Hammen, T., & Chen, C. (2020). Participation rate and demographic profile in recreational angling in The Netherlands between 2009 and 2017. Fisheries Research, 229(November 2019), 105592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105592

Vaus, D. A. de. (2002). Surveys In Social Research (Vol. 5th). Allen & Unwin 83 Alexander Stree.

Wibowo, T. (2017). Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan Middle Income Trap. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 20(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v20i2.184

Zendrato, R., & Cheng, H. N. H. (2023). Enhancing Foreign Workers' Online Learning Interaction Strategy : An Action Research in Indonesia Open University Taiwan Enhancing Foreign Workers' Online Learning Interaction Strategy : An Action Research in Indonesia Open University Taiwan. May.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/inf.v10i2.16713