Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan: Sebelum & Sesudah Merger & Akuisisi
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara tata kelola perusahaan yang diakuisisi, serta kinerjanya selama sebelum dan sesudah merger dan akuisisi (M&A). Data M&A penelitian diambil dari perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI dari tahun 2016 hingga tahun 2020. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa perusahaan yang belum melakukan M&A, komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan, sedangkan ukuran dewan komisaris memiliki efek negatif yang signifikan pada sektor tersebut. Di sisi lain, perusahaan yang telah melakukan M&A, ditemukan bahwa kepemilikan manajerial berpengaruh positif. Sedangkan, komisaris independen berpengaruh negatif signifikan dan ukuran dewan komisaris tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan. Secara keseluruhan, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tata kelola perusahaan memainkan peran penting dalam memahami efek kinerja keuangan sebelum dan sesudah melakukan M&A.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2018). The relationship between ownership structure and firm financial performance: Evidence from Jordan. Brenchmarking: An International Journal, 1463-5771.
Ang, J., Cole, R., & Lin, J. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.
Barney, J.B., (1991). Firm resources and substained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17, 99–120.
Bertrand, M., Schoar, A., 2003. Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Q. J. Econ. 118 (4), 1169–1208.
Chen, S., Lin, C.Y. (2018). Managerial ability and acquirer returns. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance: 68, 171–182.
Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176.
Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., & Demirbag, M. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 90–103.
Cui, H., & Leung, S. C. (2020). The long-run performance of acquiring firms in mergers and acquisitions: Does managerial ability matter?. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100185.
de Andres, P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F. (2005), “Corporate boards in OECD countries: size, composition, compensation, functioning and effectiveness”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (2), 197-210.
De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.
Donadelli, M., Fasan, M., & Magnanelli, B. S. (2014). The agency problem, financial performance and corruption: Country, industry and firm level perspectives. European Management Review, 11(3–4), 259–272.
Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(3), 231–243.
Einsenberg, T., Sundgren, S. and Well, M.T. (2008). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 48, pp. 342-353.
Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.
Farooque, O. A., Buanchom, W., & Sun, L. (2019). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance – emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review 32 (1), 54-81.
Holcomb, T.R., Holmes, R.M., Connelly, B.L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strateg. Manage. J. 30 (5), 457–485.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). "The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems". The Journal of Finance, 48 (3), 831-880.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Khan, Amir dan Sajid Hussain Awan. (2012). “Effect of Board Composition on Firm’s Performance: A Case of Pakistani Listed Companies”. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3 (10), 853-863.
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J.W. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, Vol. 48(1), pp. 59-77.
Rehman, R. U., & Mangla, I. (2010). Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions in Pakistan: A comparison between conventional and Islamic bank in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 49(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41428669
Tuch, C., O’Sullivan, N. (2007). The impact of acquisitions on firm performance: a review of the evidence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9 (2), 141–170.
Vaara, E., (2002). On the discursive construction of success/failure in narratives of post-merger integration. Organ. Stud. 23 (2), 211–248.
Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.
Yoshikawa, T., & McGuire, J. (2008). Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(1), 5–24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/eco.v5i2.10885
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizna Novtaviani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN: 2355-0295 || EISSN: 2549-8932
-----------------------
Indexed by:
 |  |  |  | |
 |  |  |  |
dipublikasikan oleh LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika dengan dukungan Relawan Jurnal Indonesia
Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License