Mediation As an Alternative for Dispute Resolution in Sharia Insurance in Indonesia

Bambang Heri Supriyanto

Abstract


Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution process that prioritizes a consensus approach in accordance with its consensual, consensus-based, collaborative nature. Mediation can produce a win-win solution. Mediation in resolving sharia insurance problems certainly uses a process in accordance with Islamic values. The reality of resolving sharia insurance disputes is still conventional, namely the system is not sharia-compliant. National Sharia Arbitration Board (Basyarnas) as a permanent and independent body functions to resolve sharia disputes that arise. The discussion of the problem in this paper includes the implementation of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution characterized by its consensual and collaborative approach, potentially producing mutually beneficial results, the parties often turn to Mediation which prioritizes consensual and collaborative processes to reach a common ground in disputes in sharia insurance, the role of mediators in mediation as an alternative means of dispute resolution in sharia insurance and also the driving and inhibiting factors of the mediation process at the Indonesian Muamalat Arbitration Board (Basyarnas). The conclusion is the implementation of the mediation process in resolving sharia insurance disputes in Indonesia. Primarily as a solution to resolve dispute problems in sharia insurance that occur, mediation is consensual or consensus and collaborative. Mediators in resolving sharia insurance problems quickly, precisely, comprehensively in order to maintain conducive conditions, in order to maintain the investment climate and public interest in sharia insurance. Factors in the mediation process to resolve sharia insurance conflict issues in Indonesia, namely: Limited number of mediators in the insurance sector; Good faith; lawyers; socialization



Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolf. Huala, (2006). .Analysis and Evaluation of Dispute Resolution Law through Arbitration (Law Number 30 of 1999), BPHN. 8.

Boulle. Laurance, (1996). Mediation Principles, Process, Practice., Sydney: Butterworths. 35-41.

Fuady. Munir, (2000). National Arbitration: An Alternative for Business Dispute Resolution., Bandung: Citra Aditya. 50.

Goodpaster. Garry, (1996). Review of Dispute Resolution. In the Basics of Economic Law Series 2: Arbitration in Indonesia., Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. 16.

Harahap. Yahya, (1997). Several Reviews of the Judicial System and Dispute Resolution., Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 155.

Khairandy Ridwan, (2002). Looking for Alternative Solutions, Business Law, October-November Edition. 4.

Margono Suyud, (2000). ADR & Arbitration – Institutionalization Processes and Legal Aspects., Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. 34.

Moore Christopher W, (1997). Basic Principles Underlying an Environmental Dispute Resolution System., Jakarta: Indonesian Center for Environmental Law. 85.

Widjaya. Gunawan, (2003). Alternative Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2.

Sembiring. Jimmy Joses, (2011). How to Resolve Disputes Outside the Court (Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration), Jakarta: Visi Media. 140.

Subroto. Gatot, (2006). Arbitration and sMediation in Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Garmedia Pustaka Utama. 122.

Usman. Rachmadi, (2013). Options for Dispute Resolution Outside the Court, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 332




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v25i1.27079

ISSN: 2579-3314

Dipublikasikan oleh LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

slot88qris

ak4d

ak4d

mainaja

cod178

payungtoto login

toto slot 4d

sarangslot

sarangslot

Modal138

sgpslot

sgpslot