Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations

Wina Yusnaeni, Marlina Marlina, Ratih Yulia Hayuningtyas, Retno Sari


The procurement of the goods or services of a company is determined by qualied suppliers. Therefore, it is necessary for a company to choose and evaluate the suppliers that have cooperated based on the required criteria. The purpose is that all of the suppliers can compete in improving the quality and their consistency as a supplier to the company. The process to decide the appropriate supplier in this study is multicriteria support decision methods that can help in the consistency's criteria and the accuracy of the decision. Here we perform the calculation criteria for consistency with the AHP method that will further calculate the weight of criteria and alternatives against the criteria using the method of MABAC and WASPAS. The results of the data comparison using the method of MABAC have actual results with the suppliers recommended and not recommended compared to the method of WASPAS.


multicriteria support decision, alternative, AHP method

Full Text:



Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019). Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6), e01956.

Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), 129–136.

Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Karovic, S. (2016). Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 64(3), 705–729.

Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharyya, O., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tool in non-traditional machining processes. Information Technology and Control, 44(1), 77–88.

Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Applications of WASPAS method as a multi-criteria decision-making tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49(1), 1–17.

Haldar, A., Banerjee, D., Ray, A., & Ghosh, S. (2012). An integrated approach for supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2087–2102.

Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78.

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034.

Tundo, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). Implementation of the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment Method in Determining the Best Rice for Serabi Cake Making. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 8(1), 40.

UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946–1949.

Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 1–9.

Xue-Guo, X., Shi, H., Li-Jun, Z., & Hu-Chen, L. (2019). Green supplier evaluation and selection with an extended MABAC method under the heterogeneous information environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23).

Yusnaeni, W., Marlina, Hayuningtyas, R. Y., & Sari, R. (2021). Laporan Akhir-Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recomendations.


 dipublikasikan oleh LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika Jakarta

Jl. Kramat Raya No.98, Kwitang, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10450
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License