KAJIAN STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA OLAHRAGA PARALAYANG DI KABUPATEN WONOSOBO
Sari
ABSTRAK
Dewasa ini, upaya mempromosikan dan mengembangkan potensi pariwisata berbagai daerah di Indonesia salah satunya melalui pariwisata olahraga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat pengembangan pariwisata olahraga paralayang di Bukit Kekep, Desa Lengkong, Kecamatan Garung, Kabupaten Wonosobo serta merumuskan alternatif strategi pengembangan. Metode analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif dan SWOT. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa identifikasi dan analisis faktor strategis berada pada kuadran II atau pada matriks SWOT berada pada strategi ST (Strength Threath) yang berarti pariwisata olahraga paralayang di Bukit Kekep cukup kuat dan memiliki potensi, namun peluangnya sangat mengancam sehingga dapat memanfaatkan keunggulan dalam menghadapi dan mengantisipasi tantangan untuk meraih peluang jangka panjang. Strategi yang diterapkan dalam kondisi ini adalah strategi diversifikasi, yaitu: a) Bekerjasama dalam mengelola kawasan dengan pihak Perhutani dan membuat/mendorong regulasi mengenai perubahan peruntukan sebagian lahan hutan lindung untuk kegiatan pariwisata, b) Penyelenggaraan event tahunan yang inovatif dengan memanfaatkan potensi wisata untuk menarik kunjungan wisatawan, sehingga siap dalam menghadapi persaingan antar objek wisata dan c) Pengembangan kawasan pariwisata olahraga paralayang dilakukan dengan prinsip berkelanjutan.
Kata Kunci : Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat, Pariwisata Olahraga, Strategi Pengembangan Pariwisata
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, one of the strategies to promote and develop the tourism potential of various regions in Indonesia are through sports tourism. The aim of the study was to identify the supporting and inhibiting factors for the development of paragliding tourism in Bukit Kekep, Wonosobo Regency and then formulate an alternative development strategy. Data analysis using qualitative descriptive analysis and SWOT analysis. The results showed that the identification and analysis of strategic factors are in quadrant II or on the SWOT matrix are on the ST (Strength Threath) strategy which means paragliding tourism in Bukit Kekep is quite strong and has potential, but the opportunities are very threatening so that they can take advantage of the advantages in facing and anticipating challenges to achieve long-term opportunities. The strategy applied in this condition is a diversification strategy, namely: a) Working together in managing the area with Perhutani and making / encouraging regulations regarding changes in allotment of some protected forest land for tourism activities, b) Organizing innovative annual events by utilizing tourism potential to attract tourist visits, so that they are ready to face competition between tourist attractions and, c) The development of a paragliding tourism area carried out on a sustainable principle.
Keywords: Tourism Development Strategy; Sports Tourism; Supporting and Inhibiting Factors
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Astuti, T. M. 2015. Sport Tourism to Increase Tourist Arrival in Indonesia. Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia. 10 (1) 31-40
Ayazlar, R. 2015. Flow Phenomenon as a Tourist Experience in Paragliding: A Qualitative Research. Procedia Economics and Finance. 26 ( 2015 ) 792 – 799
Bangun, S. Y. 2014. The Role of Recreational Sport Toward the Development of Sport Tourism in Indonesia in Increasing the Nations Quality of Life. Asian Social Science. Vol. 10 (5) 98-103
Baumann, R. Matheson, V. Muroi, C. 2009. Bowling in Hawaii Examining the Effectiveness of Sports-Based Tourism Strategies. Journal of Sports Economics. Volume 10 Number 1, 107-123
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Kecamatan Garung Dalam Angka 2018: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Wonosobo.
Bentley, T. Page, S. Walker, L. 2006. The Safety Experience of New Zealand Adventure Tourism Operators. Journal of Travel Medicine. 11(5) 280–286.
Flagested, A dan Hope, C. 2001. Strategic success in winter sports destinations: a sustainable value creation perspective. Tourism Management. Vol.22 (5) 445-461
Fourie, J. Santana-Gallego, M. 2011. The impact of mega-sport events on tourist arrivals. Tourism Management. 32 (2011) 1364-1370
Gibson, H. Attle, S. Yiannakis, A. 1997. Segmenting the active sport tourist market: A life-span perspective. Journal of Vacation Marketing. Vol. 4 (1) 52-64
Hardiman, N dan Burgin, S. 2011. Canyoning adventure recreation in the Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (Australia): The canyoners and canyoning trends over the last decade. Tourism Management. 32 (2011) 1324-1331
Hua, K. Ibrahim, I. Chiu, L. 2013. Sport Tourism : Physically-Disabled Sport Tourists ’ Orientation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 91 (2013) 257 – 269
Irschick, K. 2007. Paragliding Student Workbook, PLGI-Official Method. Jakarta. Pordiga Layang Gantung Indonesia (Bidang Paralayang)
Moktan, D. 2017. Attitudes and Behaviors of Tourists Towards Extreme Sports in Nepal: Case study; Paragliding-Pokhara. Thesis. Centria University of Applied Sciences
Naidoo, P. Ramseook-Munhurrun, P. Seebaluck, N.V. Janvier, S. 2015. Investigating the Motivation of Baby Boomers for Adventure Tourism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 175 ( 2015 ) 244 – 251
Nicolau, J. Santa-María, M. 2017. Sports results creating tourism value: Rafael Nadal's tennis match points worth €12,000,000. Tourism Economics. Vol. 23 (3) 697–701
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Wonosobo Nomor 8 Tahun 2018. Tentang Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Kabupaten Wonosobo Tahun 2017-2032. Wonosobo.
Soedjatmiko. 2015. Sports Tourism Development in Indonesia. Journal of Sports Science, 3 (2015) 257-261
Taleghani, G dan Ghafary, A. 2014. Providing a Management Model for the Development of Sports Tourism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 120 ( 2014 ) 289 – 298
Widodo, R. W. 2016. Analisis Potensi Pariwisata Olahraga di Kabupaten Wonosobo. Skripsi : Universitas Negeri Semarang
Yeh, C. Hua, K. Huang, C. 2016. Service quality improving effects and recreational benefits for sports tourism - A case study. Tourism Economics. Vol. 22(6) 1332–1337
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/par.v7i1.6965
